Sunday, October 27, 2013

Analyse and compare the information you have processed to assess the relative accuracy of the two models at predicting future astronomical events, such as the position of the planets.

Ptolemy?s Model became highly successful in predicting dynamic gravels of the stars and planets during the ancient times. But the predictions made with Ptolemys warning of the planetary short letter and precessions of the equinoxes were not quite consistent with the best avail satisfactory observations. Because of a particular inconsistency, astronomers made minor adjustments in the Ptolemaic mannequin to account for the inconsistency but eventually the entanglement of complexness resulting from the minor adjustments was increasing to a greater cessation rapidly than the accuracy, so a discrepancy corrected in one place was probcapable to show up in another place. Copernicus? set is able to account qualitatively for the observe motions of the stars, the Moon and the position of the planets. Copernicus precious to increase the accuracy of his model by inserting small epicycles for the aerial objects to move on. This was necessary because Copernicus false (like Ptolemy) th at the planets move at a constant quantity speed. But the ascertained motions did not correspond precisely to planets moving at constant speed. The epicycles of Copernicus were smaller than those of Ptolemy and the motion of the planets more(prenominal) or less them was practically slower so that each planet locomote in an elongated circle way.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
But even with his epicycles, Copernicus? model resulted in errors in predicting planetary positions of about 2 degrees all everywhere a few centuries of planetary motion. This is the same error in Ptolemy?s model. There was no definitive observation that could be made that would decide which of the two competing models fit the entropy m! ore accurately. So to compare the two models, it is based on the criteria of the data fitting. For example, observing stellar parallax would have clearly shown that the Earth moves and gumwood olibanum supported the heliocentric model. Both models were however able to formulate why the observed motions of... If you want to get a upright essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.