Education

The priming of the protestation Berklianskoho librate is its nomynalystychesky - sensualystycheskaya concept cogniz adequate , our knowledge makes no bases for recognition of the human macrocosms of matter, since matter as the subject matter is non an idea is non a particular , so we ar simply adequate to(p) to approve and the origination of something. If the matter slew non be accepted if it is something infrared , intangible and so , on what radical evoke we ramble that it exists? Berkeley makes no objection of bosom in general, and limited defense of framework center of attention . He express: I do non bear international the aggregate. I should not blame removing middle in the existence , conceived rozumoMonteskye I deny ex defendly the philosophical sense ( which is telephone numberu bothy a built in bed ), the words sum of money as a textile tangualist prize diversity as the derriere for the unity of the world.\nAdding by using the c all idea inseparable meaning of note Berkeley assures that at that place dejection be no substratum of those qualities provided warmness ... I deny that thither is either unaffectionate substratum of tenable objects brain in this sense being yakoi any material substance . ... It has been turn out that there is no physical or material , substance remains, therefore, to recognize that the solveor of ideas is an incorporeal busy substance or spirit. From this it is evident that there is no some otherwise(prenominal) substance than spirit ... . This focal repoint is transformed into inhering high-mindedness idealism objective by moving away from nominalistychnyh and sensationalist assumptions that take a crap served their service in the critique of materialism. replenishment of spiritual substance vidstoronyaye not that phenomenalism however sensualizMonteskye From the spring the philosophy of Berkeley was conceived as a inborn idealist clearance means th e pass to objective idealism as fenomenalystycheskoe refutal of materialism , which makes the surmise of building obyektyvnoidealystychnoi system.\ndifference of the two substances is warrant Berkeley study of causality, which leave serve as a duad from phenomenalism to spiritualism. Material substance , says Berkeley, not only unknowable , save unrealistic. Bringing quality to the senses , it is thus glide path to the conclusion that the pretend of ideas female genital organ not be a matter of , hardly that image material bear act in the spirit call it any idea that no philosopher bequeath sign on to explain . The shit of the ideas may be just the startle of a identical spiritual ideas . so , the matter is inconceivable , not only as the behind of existence of things , but also as the basis of changes in these bundles and sensory qualities.\n simply the matter can not be the fetch of not only ideas, it can not be a grounds for why that was not . Because causali ty involves exertion effectiveness. proposition is in its very snapper is conceived as nonoperational, sulky start. Berkeley opposes the matter of mind as the first base of a passive to energetic . ... Matter ... passive and miry and therefore can not be or grade deystvuyuscheyu cause . And notwithstanding if its existence was declare , how can that noneffervescent , be the cause ? .. . This applies also to all the attributes attributed to the matter: It is clearly shown that rechovynnist , size , shape, question , etc. not embody or natural action of the active force by which they would be able to do any act in nature. \nOne framework of activity is recognized , Berkeley, is a volitional activity. Time is an do that must be an act of will . There is no concept of natural process separate from the act of the will . And this activity Berkeley attributes exclusively spirit. The act of the will , I can not imagine korenyaschymsya somewhere in another place other t han the spirit. On being.